Posts Tagged ‘Web development’

So what’s better: Linux PHP or Windows ASP.NET?

Monday, May 30th, 2011

web-devEach time when a company needs to create a website, it’s managers consider (at least) three Web development platforms: Microsoft’s ASP.NET/IIS/Windows Server, Linux/Apache/MySQL/PHP (the LAMP), and Sun Java J2EE.x.

What are the principle differences between them?

J2EE requires expensive high-power servers and it’s hard to implement it in most shared or dedicated hosting environments.

ASP.NET is usually chosen by Microsoft-savvy coders. The development tools are similar to every other MS application and the learning curve is relatively short. But the deployment of such systems is more expensive, than with the LAMP, because requires licensed Microsoft software.

LAMP has become so popular both for its functionality and the fact that it’s all open source (no licensing fees!). The installation of both ASP.NET and LAMP is not complicated, and we can’t say that in this aspect one of them is better than the other.

So what’s better for your web solution? (more…)

Apps to start with for successful mobile commerce

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

mobile visits

mobile visits

Today’s situation with mobile purchases can be compared to internet purchses of the late 90’s. It is not huge yet, but the upgoing trend gives us some hints that it will be. Does it make sense to consider the new channel of sales? Yes, indeed. The next big question is which sub-channels of this channel to use first?

Native mobile apps VS web apps

Mobile websites are easier to create and maintain, but they generate only half of all visits from mobile devices and are less user-friendly than native apps due to technological constraints. Besides, native apps in some cases are more convertible (iPhone – 30% more, Android nearly the same, BlackBerry – less convertible, than average mobile website according to Kony Solutions). (more…)

Microsoft adds Groupon-style deals to Bing

Friday, March 4th, 2011

Microsoft has rolled out a new incentive to attract and keep more Bing users: Group deals.

On March 3, Microsoft introduced “Bing deals” for the desktop and mobile (m.bing.com) via a partnership with The Dealmap. Via the partnership, Bing users in the U.S. will get access to “more than 200,000 unique offers in over 14,000 cities and towns,” according to Microsoft. The Dealmap aggregates group deals from sources including Groupon, Living Social and Restaurant.com, among other sites.

Bing

Update: For now, on the mobile front, Bing deals are for iPhone and Android phones only, as reader @thedavidk pointed out. Microsoft’s official statement: “The (deals) functionality is based on HTML5 and will work with phones that support it, but today is being released for iOS and Android. Windows Phone 7 announced that they will have HTML5 support in an update later this calendar year, at which point deals will work great on Windows Phone.”

(more…)

Google Updates Social Search

Friday, February 18th, 2011

google-social-searchGoogle’s efforts to infuse its services with social elements have been relatively lackluster when not being outright stumbles, like the company’s privacy-challenged launch of Buzz last year. Google has a popular social network, Orkut, but that popularity remains confined to Brazil. And the service has been losing ground to Facebook in critical markets like India.

Google hopes to deploy more compelling social offerings this year and its latest effort along these lines demonstrates at least that the company is serious about social connectivity. Google is weaving social into search, its core service.

Google on Thursday said that it has begun mixing social content — friends’ posts to various services like YouTube, Flickr and the like — with its algorithmically determined search results.

So if your friends blog or tweet about their favorite coffee shops, your searches for coffee will return their musings, provided your friends aren’t posing somewhere that Google can’t reach, like past Facebook’s privacy settings.

Previously, social search results were more like the dregs of relevance, settling at the bottom of the search results page were they were less likely to be noticed.

(more…)

Google Claims Bing Copies Its Search Results

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011

bing-logoAfter noticing curious search results at Bing, then running a sting operation to investigate further, Google has concluded that Microsoft is copying Google search results into its own search engine.

That’s the report from Search Engine Land’s Danny Sullivan today, who talked to both companies about it and presented Google’s evidence. According to the report, a mechanism could be the Suggested Sites feature of Internet Explorer and the Bing Toolbar for browsers, both of which can gather data about what links people click when running searches.

The story began with Google’s team for correcting typographical errors in search terms, which monitors its own and rivals’ performance closely. Typos that Google could correct would lead to search results based on the correction, but the team noticed Bing would also lead to those search results without saying it had corrected the typo.

Next came the sting, setting up a “honeypot” to catch the operation in action. Google created “one-time code that would allow it to manually rank a page for a certain term,” then wired those results for particular, highly obscure search terms such as “hiybbprqag” and “ndoswiftjobinproduction,” Sullivan said. With the hand coding, typing those search terms would produce recognizable Web pages in Google results that wouldn’t show in search results otherwise.

(more…)

SWIT Investor Day